Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bone Rep ; 14: 101064, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33981810

RESUMO

The effective treatment of non-unions and critical-sized defects remains a challenge in the orthopedic field. From a tissue engineering perspective, this issue can be addressed through the application bioactive matrixes to support bone regeneration, such as Bonelike®, as opposed to the widespread autologous grafting technique. An improved formulation of Bonelike® Poro, was assessed as a synthetic bone substitute in an ovine model for critical-sized bone defects. Bone regeneration was assessed after 5 months of recovery through macro and microscopic analysis of the healing features of the defect sites. Both the application of natural bone graft or Bonelike® Poro resulted in bridging of the defects margins. Untreated defect remained as fibrous non-unions at the end of the study period. The characteristics of the newly formed bone and its integration with the host tissue were assessed through histomorphometric and histological analysis, which demonstrated Bonelike® Poro to result in improved healing of the defects. The group treated with synthetic biomaterial presented bone bridges of increased thickness and bone features that more closely resembled the native spongeous and cortical bone. The application of Bonelike® Poro enabled the regeneration of critical-sized lesions and performed comparably to the autograph technique, validating its octeoconductive and osteointegrative potential for clinical application as a therapeutic strategy in human and veterinary orthopedics.

2.
Regen Biomater ; 6(1): 49-59, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30740242

RESUMO

Development of synthetic bone substitutes has arisen as a major research interest in the need to find an alternative to autologous bone grafts. Using an ovine model, the present pre-clinical study presents a synthetic bone graft (Bonelike®) in combination with a cellular system as an alternative for the regeneration of non-critical defects. The association of biomaterials and cell-based therapies is a promising strategy for bone tissue engineering. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from human dental pulp have demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo to interact with diverse biomaterial systems and promote mineral deposition, aiming at the reconstruction of osseous defects. Moreover, these cells can be found and isolated from many species. Non-critical bone defects were treated with Bonelike® with or without MSCs obtained from the human dental pulp. Results showed that Bonelike® and MSCs treated defects showed improved bone regeneration compared with the defects treated with Bonelike® alone. Also, it was observed that the biomaterial matrix was reabsorbed and gradually replaced by new bone during the healing process. We therefore propose this combination as an efficient binomial strategy that promotes bone growth and vascularization in non-critical bone defects.

3.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 103(2): 292-304, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24819340

RESUMO

In the last decades, the well-known disadvantages of autografts and allografts have driven to the development of synthetic bone grafts for bone regeneration. Bonelike(®) , a glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite (HA) composite was developed and registered for bone grafting. This biomaterial is composed by a modified HA matrix, with α- and ß-tricalcium phosphate secondary phases. Aiming to improve the biological characteristics of Bonelike(®) , new spherical pelleted granules, of different shape and size, were developed with controlled micro and macrostructure. In the present study, it was compared the physicochemical properties and in vivo performance of different Bonelike(®) granule presentations-Bonelike(®) polygonal (500-1000 µm size) and Bonelike spherical (250-500 µm; 500-1000 µm size). For the in vivo study, Bonelike(®) was implanted on sheep femurs, with various implantation times (30 days, 60 days, 120 days, and 180 days). X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the phase composition of different granules presentations was similar. Bonelike(®) spherical 500-1000 µm was the most porous material (global porosity and intraporosity) and Bonelike(®) polygonal 500-1000 µm the less porous. Considering the in vivo study, both polygonal and spherical granules presented osteoconductive proprieties. The spherical granules showed several advantages, including easier medical application through syringe and improved osteointegration, osteoconduction, and degradation, by the presence of larger pores, controlled micro- and macrosctructure and suitable particle format that adapts to bone growth. Bonelike(®) spherical 500-1000 µm showed improved new bone invasion throughout the material's structure and Bonelike(®) spherical 250-500 µm appeared to induce faster bone regeneration, presenting less unfilled areas and less lacunae in the histological analysis.


Assuntos
Regeneração Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Substitutos Ósseos , Cerâmica , Durapatita , Animais , Substitutos Ósseos/farmacologia , Cerâmica/química , Cerâmica/farmacologia , Durapatita/química , Durapatita/farmacologia , Ovinos
4.
J Mater Sci Mater Med ; 25(8): 1885-901, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24771285

RESUMO

Presently, several bone graft substitutes are being developed or already available for clinical use. However, the limited number of clinical and in vivo trials for direct comparison between these products may complicate this choice. One of the main reasons for this scarcity it is the use of models that do not readily allow the direct comparison of multiple bone graft substitutes, due especially to the small number of implantation sites. Although sheep cancellous bone models are now well established for these purposes, the limited availability of cancellous bone makes it difficult to find multiple comparable sites within a same animal. These limitations can be overcome by the monocortical model here proposed as it consists in 5-6 holes (5 mm Ø), in the femoral diaphysis, with similar bone structure, overlying soft tissue and loading pattern for all defects. Associated to this model, it is also described a fast histomorphometric analysis method using a computer image segmentation test (Threshold method) to assess bone regeneration parameters. The information compiled through the experimental use of 45 sheep in several studies allowed determining that this ovine model has the potential to demonstrate differences in bone-forming performance between various scaffolds. Additionally, the described histomorphometric method is fast, accurate and reproducible.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis , Regeneração Óssea , Modelos Animais , Animais , Automação , Ovinos
5.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 99(1): 170-9, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21714082

RESUMO

A glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite (HA) composite, recently registered as Bonelike®, was developed for bone grafting. This biomaterial is composed of a modified HA matrix with α- and ß-tricalcium phosphate secondary phases and ionic species that mimic the chemical composition of human bone. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed the benefits of these properties. However, these studies were all executed with Bonelike® polygonal granules obtained by crushing. In this study, Bonelike® pellets were produced through a patented process, which required the use of techniques such as extrusion and spheronization. The final product presented a homogeneous size, a 55.1% global porosity and a spherical shape. This spherical shape permitted a better adaptation to the implantation site and improved injectability. Additionally, it also may contribute to formation of macropores as pellets packaging leaves open spaces. After implantation of Bonelike® polygonal granules and Bonelike® pellets in monocortical defects in sheep for 8 and 12 weeks, light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy showed extensive osteointegration simultaneously with bone regeneration for both presentations. Histomorphometric analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between defects treated with Bonelike® polygonal granules and Bonelike® pellets, which suggests similar in vivo performances.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Durapatita/química , Durapatita/síntese química , Animais , Materiais Biocompatíveis/síntese química , Materiais Biocompatíveis/química , Substitutos Ósseos/síntese química , Substitutos Ósseos/química , Transplante Ósseo/instrumentação , Fosfatos de Cálcio/química , Humanos , Implantes Experimentais , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Tamanho da Partícula , Porosidade , Ovinos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...